I don't think so. It's about personal, subjective nuance. Some people interpret it as silly, to me it's just another generic verbal symbol that refers to race, with no other connotations implied. And it looks to me like the majority of comments here are in agreement.

Another example: to me the article makes it quite clear who the victim is. That's what "white supremacy" means: an ideology that victimizes people. What other meaning does white supremacy have?

Creating victimology where none really exists is the most popular cop-out computer-generated argument in the world for those who seek to justify their blind tribal hate. If that's not exactly what she was trying to do, she sure fooled me.